I know that I’m extremely lucky that Laurel generally is a happy and agreeable kid who isn't prone to meltdowns. But last week, after a fabulous day spent in the Public Garden, followed by lunch at the Au Bon Pain on Boylston Street, the rest of the day was tainted by the crisis that broke out over a giant Easter basket full of candy - strategically positioned at the Au Bon Pain checkout.
I have a few beefs here (and then I'll get on to the tips and strategies):
First, I’m not a parent who refuses my daughter sweets. In fact, just minutes prior to the cash register incident, Laurel finished eating an M&M cookie the size of her head.
Second, I know it is classic end cap marketing, but I dread retailers that offer bright, shiny, and sugary objects at checkout (it’s one of the reasons I was so excited to learn that Stop & Shop offers family friendly lanes with healthy snacks). Seriously, Laurel’s grudge lasted from incident all the way to bedtime.
Third, it wasn’t Laurel’s sobbing meltdown that bothered me (and actually, she even waited until we were well clear of APB to let loose) – after all, she is four years old. What bugged me is that I don’t want my kid to be greedy and bratty. Plus, I never would have pulled that sort of thing with my parents so it made me wonder whether this behavior is due to my parenting (total downer).
Fourth, only semi-related but definitely worth mention, that ABP bathroom was disgusting. It was generally gross and dirty, and also rather broken. The toilet paper dispenser hung from a thread, and there was a hole punched in the wall and stuffed with paper towels. Laurel actually thought this hole was the trash. I hope someone at Au Bon Pain reads this post and fixes up that bathroom.
But I digress. My main issue that day was the battle over sweets, coupled with my realization that over the last several weeks it seems as if we’ve been dealing with dessert negotiation more and more (our typical rule is no more than one treat per day). I’m not quite sure whether this evolved from peer influence at lunch (I only include fruit or fruit + one Hershey’s kiss for sweet content compared to Laurel’s peers, who apparently get way more loot) or periodic blurry lines on weekends (if you have kringle in the morning for breakfast can you still have dessert after dinner?).
Furthermore, it occurred to me that even the standard of a maximum of one sweet treat per day is so far from what I grew up on, where we only had sweets on special occasions (e.g., birthdays), or if we earned the money to buy candy from the store ourselves. (Though I don’t think my parent’s extreme withholding strategy was the answer either.)
Jon and I had a long discussion that evening about how to move forward to try to reduce these annoying negotiations. Here are some strategies that have worked well for us to date, as well as some new strategies we’re trying to implement. If you have tips for negotiating sugar battles with your kids, please share in the comments below!
+ + + + +
Stay consistent with the rules. Whether you do sweets once a week or once a day, be as consistent as possible with the rules. I think our periodic slippage (especially on weekends) has contributed to the current feeling that sweets are negotiable (or obtainable with enough pestering).
Be explicit with each sugary interaction. It occurred to me and Jon that as a 4-year-old with her eyes on the immediate prize, Laurel probably doesn’t have the same concept of time as we do. For us, dessert is typically after dinner, so if, for example, we’re in a situation faced with treats at lunchtime, we ask her whether she is sure she wants dessert now, because it means she won’t have any after dinner. Or we make a point of saying that it’s fine for her to have the dessert after lunch, but then that’s it for the day.
If need be, split it up. Another strategy that we have been experimenting with is still reinforcing to Laurel that she gets a maximum of one treat per day, but allowing her to split it up so she gets half after lunch and half after dinner.
Feed fruit first. We always make sure that after a meal Laurel has fruit before dessert. She loves fruit, so it doesn’t seem a chore, and in addition to being more nutritious, it fills her belly so there’s less room for dessert.
Reinforce the concept of listening to your belly. Laurel is still very good about stopping eating when she’s full (versus just eating because food is there). The one time this didn’t happen was when she experienced her first s’more this past summer – in which case, she ate two and felt sick to her stomach after. So in the face of an unusual, large, or decadent dessert, we always remind her to listen to her belly and be sure to stop when she’s full so she doesn’t get sick. We can always pack up the rest to take home for the next day.
Pose a challenge and reward. The strange thing about the above ABP episode was that it followed a week where we had, as a family, decided to try to go dessert free for 3 days. The impetus was that Laurel wanted to try a banana split and we said that it was such a big dessert that she probably should go a few days beforehand without. So we told her that if she could go the 3 days without dessert, she could order whatever kind of sundae she wanted. Amazingly, the 3 days passed easily and when she did get that banana split, she still ate a kid-sized portion and left the rest. I think we should do more of those kinds of exercises to show her how sweets are more habit than need.
Model non-dessert behavior. Clearly, Jon and my own love for sweets is part of the problem. And after the aforementioned 3 days passed, I was amazed by how easy it was to go without. We clearly were in a habit of eating sweets. So given that, plus my current commitment to a shredding challenge with some online friends, I decided to continue on and see if I could make it through a whole week without dessert, which I did (even resisting flan!) with no problem. I think it helped to model this behavior for Laurel (she constantly was offering to share her dessert with me and I would explain why I wasn't eating it) and I will continue to do so as I work on curbing my own intake. It feels enormously good for a treat to be just that – a treat that is special and to be enjoyed.
Implement teeth brushing as a consequence of dessert. One thing that we’re currently not great about but that I think could help our cause is to have Laurel (and us) brush immediately following any dessert when we’re at home. Not only would this be great on the oral hygiene front, but I suspect that since teeth brushing is considered sort of a chore, it may make Laurel think twice about whether some treats are worth the effort.
+ + + + +
Ultimately, I've been so happy reducing my own sugar intake and I hope to reduce Laurel's so she's not indulging every day. But at the moment, I'd be happy to get to a point where we don't battle over sugar as we did at the ABP checkout.
Again, if you have tips for negotiating sugar battles with your kids, please share in the comments below!
Image credit: FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Comments
I can't say we have figured this out completely but I'll tell you a couple of things we've done---we used to give the kids dessert (usually a popsicle) every night but switched it to just "fruit dessert" during the week with a more "fun dessert" after dinner on the weekends---e.g., a small cup of ice cream. There was hardly any griping about this at all. I try to have a ton of fruit available so that they usually ask for fruit several times a day. For a few days after a "candy holiday" (Easter, Halloween), I let them eat what they want and then it goes away. I've tried to let them stretch it out and have just a piece or two a day but I think that actually is worse for their teeth---plus, a lot of the candy they get is pretty gross, so I don't mind tossing it after they've eaten their favorites.
Posted by: Fairly Odd Mother | April 13, 2009 9:23 PM | Reply to this comment
You and I must have just had a mind meld! The other day I posted an article on negotiating dessert with kids and even used the same image. Clearly, great minds think alike.
Here is the link to my article, which includes some great tips on how to negotiate the dessert challenge with your kids:
http://whatscookingblog.com/2009/04/06/negotiating-dessert-with-the-kids/
Posted by: Michelle | April 13, 2009 10:47 PM | Reply to this comment
I'm lucky that this is one area where I don't have conflict with my 6-yr-old! I give most of the credit to the babysitter he was with 20-30 hr per week from 6 mos to 2.5 yrs. She made soup, bread, tiramisu, everything from scratch. I don't eat many sweets, but think he had some sweet snack a couple times a week with her. The result is that he's really not into sweets. I've seen him set down a just-opened dumdum to dive into a fruit plate. We've been through a phase where we each at 1 ice cream cone per day, (I was going through a rough patch) and once had a banana split for supper, but if there is ever a battle over sweets, it is almost certainly over control. If I give in, or if he successfully grabs it, he nearly always sticks it in his pocket 'for later'. I'm sure that you would've had Laurel choose between the cookie and the Easter basket had you had a choice. In our situation, if he had asked politely and confirmed that he was willing to give up something else for it, or pay for it with 'his own' money (I let him have the change when we go shopping), I would probably have let him have it. I don't know if that works for a cookie-monster-kid.
My major gripe about sweets is using them as rewards. My son wouldn't even take the dumdum the first time a preschool assistant pressed one into his hand. I'm certain that setting candy up as something great you get for doing really well has elevated its status in my son's eyes.
Posted by: jen | April 14, 2009 6:55 AM | Reply to this comment
As it turns out, my almost 5-year-old doesn't have much a sweet-tooth, but he does have a serious penchant for McDonald's...introduced initially by grandparents, and sadly reinforced by occassional convenience dinner stops by us. After the din of weekly cries for McDonald's became to much, I sat down with him and explained, in clear pre-school English, why eating McDonald's isn't a good idea -- it's junk food (regardless of how much they fresh food-coat their marketing), plain and simple. Junk food doesn't power your body the way you need in order to run, jump, play, etc. With him, it's all about explaining the "why" if the answer is no, and usually it works. I still get requests for McDonald's (because, let's face it, it tastes darn good), but he backs down almost instantly when I say no now.
Posted by: Paige | April 14, 2009 10:08 AM | Reply to this comment
Jen, thanks for your comment; it reminded me of something interesting. Laurel also has a money jar, where if she really wants something, we discuss it and she either pays for it or we pitch in with her. The funny thing is that she has never asked to buy sweets -- instead, it's always art supplies or something.
And similar as with your son, I think that even if I had bought the basket I'm sure that she would have just brought it home since her stomach was already full, or maybe had a tiny bite and brought the rest home. It was more about acquisition.
Perhaps sweets are not on her mind all the time; but rather, are hard to not reflexively ask for when they're right in front of her, or at a (now conditioned) time like after a meal. And then at that point (I find depending on mood... e.g., if she's tired and cranky it's worse) it can turn into a power struggle thing.
Posted by: Christine Koh - Editor | April 14, 2009 3:18 PM | Reply to this comment
Christine, loved this post. I really think your experience is pretty universal, and having the pleasure of seeing you first hand with your very, very "Sweet" Laurel, I think you handled things beautifully. Funny thing...On the drive back to NY, I mentioned to David how impressed I was with your response in the car to the "Sweet" episode and upon pulling up to the Meridian when it was time for the playdate to end. May not have the exact words, but you said something like, "Because that's what we're going to do". Very matter of fact. No huge discussion or trying to over rationalize, which I have a tendency to do. Molly heard me sharing this with David and responded with, "Mom, you should do that more. I bet you can't do that for a month." Hate to say it, but the girl is right! I've been trying it, but so far it's not working for me. I reminded Molly I'm doing it for a month and she had a meltdown,lol.
Posted by: Meryl Otis Kessler | April 15, 2009 12:33 AM | Reply to this comment
This is a really great post, and timely for me as well. I have a wicked sweet tooth myself - always have, probably always will - and have virtually no willpower when faced with the various bowls of candy that pop up around my office at holidaytime (like Easter). I also like to bake, and so we often have sweets of various types around my kitchen. I'm lucky that my daughter isn't crazy for sweets, but we've definitely locked in a few dessert battles in recent months. The best strategy that I've found - good for kids and grownups - is to create a norm in which dessert is ALWAYS composed of both fruit and a little treat. Dessert is generally also only once a day, and I usually keep sweets out of the lunchbox. With spring coming and me thinking about getting in better shape, I know that I have to deal with my own sweet tooth, and this post is a great reminder that the same issues apply to the whole family!
Posted by: Kate Fichter | April 17, 2009 10:36 AM | Reply to this comment