Boston.com Update & Letters
I’m incredibly grateful to everyone for their support following last week’s unfortunate dealings with Boston.com online marketing. The subsequent comments, tweets, and posts truly reflected the passion that readers and bloggers have for transparency, as well as the beauty and power of social media. I just wish I could thank everyone individually; please accept my virtual hugs and handshakes!
Meanwhile, here is an update on what transpired following my post on Friday. Boston.com’s head of community publishing responded quickly and their marketing team ultimately removed the campaign (as well as the similar campaign we learned was being run to benefit from another mom site). Unfortunately, what followed was not an apology, but a shifting of the onus to me. I was told that the situation would have been resolved quicker had I just contacted them directly.
Similar to the ill-conceived Google marketing campaign, this response seemed – sadly – to completely miss the point.
I just submitted a letter to the editor of The Boston Globe and a letter to the BoMoms editorial staff. In the spirit of full transparency I have included both of these letters below. Please let me know if you see the Globe letter published. And thanks again for your amazing outpouring of support!
Image credit: Media Bistro
Submitted to letter@globe.com February 23, 2009
[Editor: In the spirit of full transparency, this letter will be posted at BostonMamas.com]
To the Editor:
Last week I discovered – and detailed on my blog – that Boston.com employed a Google Adwords campaign to direct users searching for my domain name (“bostonmamas.com”) to Boston.com’s mom site BoMoms.
This deceitful campaign clearly hit a nerve – with both my readers and the broader social media community – representing a troubling example of a major corporation trying to take advantage of an independent blog. Boston.com did ultimately respond quickly and remove the campaign, but then followed not by issuing an apology, but by shifting the onus to me – telling me that they “would have been able to take care of it quicker” had I contacted them directly. Yes, of course it would have been quicker. And less embarrassing too. Sadly, similar to the ill-conceived Google marketing campaign, this response completely missed the point.
In some marketing circles, the actions of Boston.com may seem like business as usual, but that does not make them ethically acceptable. And in my opinion, no amount of dishonestly earned clicks can counterbalance eroded integrity.
The beauty of online publishing is that it offers a powerful way to create community. Boston.com would do well to address the disrespect shown to its readers and the very community it seeks to be a part of with a round of apologies not just to BostonMamas.com, but to WorkItMom.com (who we discovered also was a victim of the same Adwords campaign), any other impacted sites, and the staffers and freelancers who pour their hearts into the creative content of Boston.com yet ultimately are demeaned by this devious behavior.
Christine Koh
Founder & Editor
BostonMamas.com
Submitted to bomoms@boston.com February 23, 2009
[BoMoms Editor: Please forward this email to your editorial staff. In the spirit of full transparency, this letter – as well one to The Boston Globe - will be posted at BostonMamas.com]
To the BoMoms Editorial Staff:
I’m writing to follow up on my post regarding Boston.com’s Google Adwords campaign to direct users searching for “bostonmamas.com” to BoMoms. If you haven’t read the post, I hope you will do so rather than simply hear about the situation secondhand. The post makes clear that my issue was with Boston.com’s marketing of BoMoms, not with the BoMoms site itself. I have nothing but well wishes for websites that seek to foster a sense of community and provide useful and entertaining content to readers, and I’m a firm believer that collaboration is key to true online community building. Your former editor Alexandra Hall and I had a very positive conversation about this issue last summer.
As I expressed in the post, Boston.com’s marketing campaign was troubling for a number of reasons, and my readers and the broader social media community responded in turn. You all are among those who deserve an apology from Boston.com marketing and I have written a letter to the editor of The Boston Globe to this effect.
With best wishes,
Christine Koh
Founder & Editor
BostonMamas.com



















Comments
Christine, I am just catching up on this whole thing right now... thank you for sharing this update, as well as the letters you wrote. It is amazing to me that they tried to capitalize on your success in such a way. And then to see that the same was done with Work It, Mom really shows that there was intention there. Sad.
Here is a virtual pat on the back for standing up for yourself, and really all of us in this sphere.
Posted by: Jane - Mom Generations | February 23, 2009 3:53 PM | Reply to this comment
well said, my friend. you are a classy lady!
Posted by: tracyp | February 24, 2009 8:38 AM | Reply to this comment
I just caught wind of this situation and I'm so sorry this happened. It's disgusting and unethical behavior on the part of such a giant publication like the Boston Globe. I hope this is resolved quickly and in the right manner. I don't like their second response to you and hope they own up completely to their crappy ways. Whoever was involved in the decision to run this campaign - from the person who had the idea to the person who signed off on the marketing budget dollars to make it happen - needs to be put under the microscope or fired. If they want to be a serious player in social media with their blog and marketing then they need to play nice with bloggers. Good luck to you!
Posted by: Carla | February 24, 2009 8:45 AM | Reply to this comment
Sigh. I just learned over at Universal Hub of some more unsavory behavior from Boston.com - in this case, Boston.com is going after WickedLocal.com's neighborhood sites.
Posted by: Christine Koh - Editor | March 3, 2009 10:14 AM | Reply to this comment
Regretfully, I don't have an update on this situation in the way of response from The Boston Globe or BoMoms following my above letters, but I wanted to tag in after hearing today from a friend who described this situation to an intellectual property law professor. The professor responded:
“[Trademark] Registration isn't the key thing here, it's whether (a) the URL has secondary meaning to the relevant consumers (they recognize it as indicating a specific source), though I'll assume it does, and (b) the Boston Globe's use causes confusion about source or sponsorship. In general, TM doesn't bar the use of someone else's mark in comparative ads, but if the ad isn't explicitly comparative, the BG could be in trouble. The use of .com is pretty dangerous and I wouldn't have advised them to do that.”
No wonder Boston.com took down the link so quickly.
Posted by: Christine Koh - Editor | March 14, 2009 1:26 AM | Reply to this comment
I just stopped my print subscription to the Globe. I'm sorry that they are stooping to such levels but it doesn't surprise me. They've never recovered from the deep cuts they made to their staff a few years ago and it is obvious in their paper, their quality of reporting and in their tactics to steal clicks. Good for you for addressing the issue head on.
Liz
Posted by: Liz | March 16, 2009 9:34 AM | Reply to this comment